Key result
Active-fixation temporary transvenous pacing linked to ~28-point lower lead dislocation rate vs passive fixation.
Why the study?
Transvenous temporary pacing is associated with a substantial dislocation rate ranging from 10 to 37%, motivating assessment of a new active-fixation lead for safety and utility in prolonged pacing.
Cohort (n=72)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Active-fixation leads may reduce dislocations in prolonged temporary pacing; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Transvenous temporary pacing is associated with a substantial dislocation rate reported to range from 10 to 37%. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and utility of a recently introduced 3.5 Fr temporary pacing lead using active fixation in a consecutive series of 36 patients with prolonged (> or = 48 hours) transvenous temporary pacing (validation group). A group of 36 patients with prolonged transvenous pacing managed with a passive-fixation lead just prior to the introduction of the active-fixation lead served as a control group (reference group). Pacing related adverse events included dislocation, inappropriate pacing (i.e., two-fold or greater increase of initial pacing threshold), local infection, and thrombosis. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or duration of pacing (5.84 +/- 2.4 days in the reference group vs 5.94 +/- 2.6 days in the validation group). Acute pacing threshold was significantly higher in the validation group as compared to the reference group (1.38 +/- 0.67 V vs. 0.7 +/- 0.21 V, P < 0.01). The dislocation rate was significantly lower in the validation group as compared to the reference group (5.5 vs 33.3%, P < 0.001). There were 11 (31%) pacing related adverse events in the validation group versus 21 (58%) in the reference group (P < 0.01). The vast majority of patients in the validation group (75%) had ambulatory temporary pacing. Thus, transvenous temporary pacing using active fixation is safe and is associated with a low dislocation rate and a reduction in pacing related adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cock et al. (2003) conducted a cohort in Requirement for prolonged transvenous temporary pacing (n=72). 3.5 Fr temporary pacing lead using active fixation vs. Passive-fixation lead was evaluated on Dislocation rate (p=< 0.001). Prolonged temporary transvenous pacing using an active-fixation lead reduced the dislocation rate compared to a passive-fixation lead.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: