Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Home delivery (HD) of medication is a goal of the Department of Health's Pharmacy in the Future; Implementing the NHS Plan. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of an HD service for antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients on ART with stable viral load (VL) <50 were identified. Comparison was made between patients using HD and those using the clinic-based pharmacy (CP). The primary endpoint was HIV virological failure (VF) (HIV VL >400 copies/mL on two consecutive occasions). Secondary endpoints included frequency of outpatient attendances (OPA) and an incidence of adverse events. Cumulative incidences (CulmIn) for each outcome event were calculated. Incidence-rate ratios (IRR) were obtained using Poisson regression. Of 1663 patients identified; 450 received HD and 1213 used CP. CuImIn of VF was =4% in those using HD and =7% in those using CP (IRR [95% confidence intervals, CI] =0.53, 0.32-0.90). HD patients had fewer OPA, less frequent blood test monitoring and less frequent abnormal liver function results (IRR [95% CI]= 0.63 [0.59-0.67] and 0.59 [0.53-0.67], 0.68 [0.65-0.71] and 0.64 [0.53-0.78], respectively). Patients deemed stable enough on social, psychological and medical grounds to receive HD of ART had a lower risk of VF, fewer OPA and no increase in adverse events when compared with patients using CP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harte et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: