Key result
Predicted reduced left ventricular ejection fraction after acute coronary syndrome was associated with higher all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
Population-based studies of ACS are often limited by the lack of structured LVEF data in administrative registries, motivating development of a prediction model for reduced LVEF.
Can an ICD-10-CM-based prediction model accurately identify reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome using administrative data?
Cohort (n=83,357)
Yes
Can an ICD-10-CM-based prediction model accurately identify reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and predict adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome using administrative data?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An ICD-10-CM-based prediction model provides reasonable discrimination for identifying reduced LVEF in ACS patients, enabling exploratory population-level characterization and prognostication in administrative databases lacking structured echocardiographic data.
Population-based studies of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are often limited by the lack of structured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data in administrative registries. We developed a logistic regression model using ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes and two clinical variables to estimate the probability of reduced LVEF (<50%) at discharge after ACS, and examined the prognostic value of the resulting classification in a large population-based cohort. The model was derived from 1596 patients with pre-discharge echocardiographic LVEF. In a 10-fold cross-validation analysis that repeated predictor selection within each train-ing fold, the procedure yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.711 (95% CI, 0.680–0.741). The fixed 28-predictor model, subsequently applied to the population-based cohort, yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.738 in the corresponding cross-validation analysis. The fixed 28-predictor model was then applied to 83,357 patients from the population-based BEAT-HF cohort (Catalonia, 2011–2021), in whom reference LVEF was unavailable. Patients classified as having reduced LVEF had a less favourable clinical profile and significantly higher rates of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Predicted reduced LVEF was associated with higher observed rates of all-cause mortality (HR 2.45, 95% CI 2.35–2.55; p < 0.001), as well as higher risks of heart failure (HF) and major adverse cardiovascular events. The model should not guide individual clinical decisions but may support exploratory population-level characterization of patients in administrative data. Validation against measured LVEF is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cosa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=83,357). Predicted reduced LVEF (<50%) using an ICD-10-CM-based model vs. Predicted preserved LVEF was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.45, 95% CI 2.35-2.55, p=< 0.001). Predicted reduced left ventricular ejection fraction after acute coronary syndrome was associated with higher all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: