Key result
Seaport criteria confirm active lymphocytic myocarditis in ~90% of suspected autopsy cases.
Why the study?
The histological diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis at autopsy lacks standardized criteria and has limited reproducibility for non-biopsy specimens.
Does the application of the Seaport criteria provide a feasible and standardized approach for diagnosing lymphocytic myocarditis at autopsy?
Observational (n=50)
Does the application of the Seaport criteria provide a feasible and standardized approach for diagnosing lymphocytic myocarditis at autopsy?
The Seaport criteria are feasible and useful for standardized histopathological diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis in non-biopsy autopsy specimens.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve autopsy myocarditis diagnosis reproducibility; leaves open need for prospective validation before adoption.
Background The histological diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis at autopsy is challenged by limited reproducibility and the lack of standardized criteria applicable to non-biopsy specimens. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the new Seaport criteria for autopsy in a heterogeneous cohort of clinical autopsies. Methods An autopsy cohort of 50 consecutive cases was retrospectively revaluated, including 10 sudden death cases originally diagnosed as lymphocytic myocarditis and 40 controls (ischemic heart disease, brain diseases, liver diseases, and metastatic neoplasms). Each case was reclassified according to Seaport criteria as myocarditis (focal, multifocal, or diffuse), lymphocytic infiltrate of uncertain significance (LIUS), or no inflammation. Immunohistochemistry (CD3, CD68, C4d) and molecular testing for viral genome were carried out in myocarditis/LIUS cases. Results By applying the Seaport criteria for autopsy, active lymphocytic myocarditis was confirmed in 9 of 10 originally diagnosed cases, either focal (33%) or multifocal (67%) and never diffuse; one case was reclassified as LIUS. Three additional cases among controls showed LIUS, yielding an overall LIUS prevalence of 8% in the entire series. A subepicardial confluent topography was observed in four myocarditis cases. Temporal assessment revealed subacute forms in 55.6% and acute in 44.4%. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the lymphocytic type, and viral genome was identified in 3/9 myocarditis cases. Conclusions The Seaport criteria are a useful tool in the autopsy setting, supporting a standardized approach to the diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis. Refinement of these criteria including topographic distribution of inflammation is warranted. The clinical significance of LIUS remains to be assessed in larger series with clinicopathological correlations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crudele et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Lymphocytic myocarditis (n=50). Seaport criteria for autopsy vs. Original diagnosis was evaluated on Confirmation of active lymphocytic myocarditis. Applying the Seaport criteria confirmed active lymphocytic myocarditis in 9 of 10 originally diagnosed autopsy cases and identified lymphocytic infiltrate of uncertain significance in 8% overall.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: