Key result
Pain is linked to ~22-point worse quality-of-life scores in patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
The pain experience in early phases of chronic heart failure is poorly documented and poorly understood, limiting recognition and management of this symptom.
Cross-Sectional (n=300)
No
Supports pain assessment in chronic HF care; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve quality of life.
BACKGROUND: Although evidence exists to support the presence of pain in advanced stages of heart failure (HF), the pain experience in the early phases of this progressive disease is poorly documented, and therefore, poorly understood. The current study was conducted to: 1) examine the prevalence of pain in cohort of patients with chronic HF (New York Heart Association class I-IV); and 2) determine the relationship between pain and QOL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were obtained from 300 patients (mean age 54.2+/-12.7 years; 72% male; 65% Caucasians; time since HF diagnosis 4.6+/-4.8 years). Two-thirds of the patients (67%) reported some degree of pain; the prevalence of pain increased as functional class worsened (p<.009). Differences in QOL outcomes for patients experiencing pain vs. no pain were statistically significant for physical and overall QOL. Pain accounted for 20% of the variance in QOL (p<.001) even after adjusting for age, gender, and functional class. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest pain is present in a majority of patients with HF. Given the potential deleterious effects of untreated pain on QOL in patients with HF, it is important that healthcare providers assess patients for this often-unrecognized symptom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evangelista et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic Heart Failure (n=300). Presence of pain vs. Absence of pain was evaluated on Overall Quality of Life (Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire score, where lower is better) (p=<0.04). Pain was reported by 67% of patients with chronic heart failure and was associated with significantly worse overall quality of life scores (47.3 vs 25.6, p<0.04), accounting for 20% of the variance in QOL.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: