Key result
Baseline sleep apnea severity links to ICD therapy, but acute worsening does not precede events.
Why the study?
Sleep apnea syndrome has been reported to be associated with a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, but the relationship between SAS severity and life-threatening arrhythmias in ICD patients was unclear.
Cohort (n=46)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Baseline severity may aid arrhythmic risk stratification in low-LVEF ICD patients; leaves open whether treatment modifies events.
BACKGROUND: Sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) has been reported to be associated with a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate whether in SAS patients receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) the severity of SAS was associated with the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias; (2) to assess whether changes in nocturnal apnoic/hypopnoic episodes may favor the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias, that is, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/fibrillation (VF), requiring ICD intervention. METHODS: We enrolled 46 patients with documented SAS at polysomnography (apnea/hypopnea index [AHI] > 5) who also had a left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% and, according to primary prevention indications, implanted an ICD (Boston Scientific Incepta) able to daily monitor apnoic/hypopnoic episodes occurring during sleep. Patients were followed at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 18 months, 21 episodes of sustained VT/FV requiring ICD intervention were documented in eight patients (17.4%). Baseline AHI was significantly higher in patients with compared to those without ICD intervention. ICD interventions, however, were not preceded by any worsening of apnoic/hypopnoic episodes. The respiratory disturbance index (RDI) of the week during the event, indeed, was not different from that recorded during the previous 2 weeks (25.4 ± 11, 25.6 ± 10 and 25.1 ± 10, respectively; p = .9). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SAS who received an ICD for primary prevention of sudden death, those with ICD interventions showed a more severe form of the disease at baseline. ICD interventions, however, were not preceded by any significant changes in SAS severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bencardino et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Sleep apnea syndrome and left ventricular dysfunction requiring primary prevention ICD (n=46). Sleep apnea syndrome severity vs. Lower sleep apnea syndrome severity / preceding weeks without events was evaluated on Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) requiring ICD intervention (p=.9). Higher baseline sleep apnea severity was associated with subsequent ICD interventions for life-threatening arrhythmias, but these events were not preceded by an acute worsening of sleep apnea severity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: