The objective was to develop the Surgical Patient’s Anxious Condition Assessment Scale (SPAC) to provide evidence supporting clinical non-pharmacological interventions. A qualitative study was conducted at Leshan People’s Hospital in Sichuan Province, China. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 11 patients to create an item pool for the scale. This was followed by a Delphi expert inquiry ( N = 16) and a pilot test ( N = 30), with subsequent adjustments to the scale based on patient feedback. Surgical inpatients from the same hospital were surveyed using the scale, and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a random sample ( N = 376). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on a second sample ( N = 386).Reliability and validity were assessed using convergent validity (correlation analysis between SPAC and STAI-S, n = 57). The final version of the SPAC consists of 10 items. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.893. Results from exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO) measure of sampling adequacy of 0.937 and an approximate chi-square value of 2144.652 for Bartlett’s sphericity test (df = 45, p < 0.001), indicating that the data were highly suitable for factor analysis. Since the items were in a three-point Likert scale format and thus constituted an ordinal categorical variable, the analysis was based on a polychoric correlation matrix, and principal axis factor analysis (PAF) was used to extract factors. Based on the criterion of eigenvalues greater than 1, a single common factor was extracted, accounting for 62.3% of the cumulative variance. The factor loadings for each item ranged from 0.71 to 0.82, all exceeding the acceptance criterion of 0.40.The CFA results indicated a chi-square of freedom ratio of 4.080, a Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.942, a Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) of 0.926, a Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.058, and a Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) of 0.067, Convergent validity test (correlation between SPAC and STAI-S: r = 0.424, p = 0.001).The scale demonstrates good construct validity and internal consistency. Overall, the SPAC shows satisfactory psychometric properties and may serve as a screening measure for surgery-related cognitive worry. Nevertheless, its clinical utility is preliminary and awaits validation of predictive validity and cut-off scores. For now, the scale should be used mainly for research purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
WEI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: