Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Used vehicle valuation requires both a price estimate from vehicle attributes and an interpretable account of visible condition. This paper presents AutoGauge, a web application integrating XGBoost regression, YOLOv8n damage detection, and SHapley Additive exPlanations. A dataset audit identifies 7,396 car records after excluding 7,313 two-wheelers from the supplied raw file. In the recorded tabular benchmark, XGBoost achieves a mean absolute error of 43,754.48 price units, a root mean squared error of 83,611.20, and an R² of 0.9189 on 1,480 test records. Its mean absolute error is 7.35% lower than Random Forest on this split and 12.31% lower in subsequent five-fold training-partition cross-validation. A separate damage evaluation on 374 images reports mAP50 of 0.7269 and mAP50–95 of 0.5662. The application translates detections into a heuristic condition score and uses a price model trained with simulated condition adjustments. Because price records and damage images are unpaired, these component results do not demonstrate that image fusion improves observed-price prediction. Preprocessing leakage, historical data coverage, and uncalibrated condition penalties are discussed as limits of the present evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaikh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: