This qualitative study explored U.S. family child care (FCC) educators’ definitions of high-quality practice to inform a contextually situated approach to quality measurement. Nineteen virtual focus groups were conducted with 95 FCC educators from 20 U.S. states, including Spanish-speaking participants. Research Findings: Educators described quality as a holistic, relational construct encompassing 12 dimensions that grouped into three major themes: quality as relational and sustained over time, quality as enacted through everyday learning and caregiving experiences, and quality as sustained by educator well-being and professional practice. Participants frequently noted ways typical quality measures and quality improvement systems fail to capture these integrated aspects of FCC practice. Practice or Policy: Results suggest that quality measurement in FCC should account for how relational, instructional, caregiving, and administrative dimensions of practice are integrated in home-based settings. More broadly, the findings underscore the importance of incorporating educators’ perspectives when defining and assessing quality across ECE contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hooper et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: