Key result
TAVR shows no evidence of restenosis or prosthetic valve dysfunction at midterm follow-up.
Why the study?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was developed to treat severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients unsuitable for surgical valve replacement, but early procedural challenges and long-term outcomes required evaluation.
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement offer a safe and durable therapeutic solution for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are not surgical candidates?
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement offer a safe and durable therapeutic solution for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are not surgical candidates?
Early global experience indicates that transcatheter aortic valve replacement is feasible with no midterm evidence of restenosis or prosthetic dysfunction, pending confirmation from ongoing randomized trials.
The concept of transcatheter aortic valve replacement was developed with the goal of offering a therapeutic solution to patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are not considered good candidates for surgical valve replacement. Initial attempts were complicated by vascular access problems and lack of appropriate tools. With time and experience, early problems were solved and the concepts of valve sizing, valve positioning, and patient selection were defined. Technological improvements allowed the use of smaller arterial sheaths to decrease vascular trauma, special catheters to facilitate valve delivery, and treatments on the valve prostheses that would ensure longer durability. After 5 years, the number of transcatheter aortic valve replacements has grown significantly, and will likely continue as this technology becomes increasingly available. Currently, 2 valve models, the Edwards SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifescience, Irvine, California) and the CoreValve ReValving system (CoreValve Inc., Irvine, California), have been used in over 4,000 cases worldwide for the treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis. Midterm follow-up shows no evidence of restenosis or prosthetic valve dysfunction. Transfemoral and transapical delivery routes can be selected depending on the quality of vascular access and the type of prosthesis used. Randomized trials that are currently underway will confirm procedural safety and guide the applicability of this technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zajarías et al. (2009) conducted a review in Symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was evaluated. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been used in >4,000 cases worldwide for symptomatic aortic stenosis, showing no evidence of restenosis or prosthetic dysfunction at midterm follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: