Background/Objectives: Dietary nitrate supplementation improves exercise performance in recreationally active individuals, but efficacy in athletes remains debated. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on six exercise performance and physiological/perceptual outcomes—peak power (PP), mean power (MP), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), heart rate (HR), blood lactate (LAC), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE)—in athletes across diverse sports and protocols. Methods: Forty-five randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 659 healthy athletes (Tier 2 or higher) were included. Random-effects meta-analyses calculated pooled Hedges’ g. Subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were conducted. Results: No statistically significant overall effect was found for any of the six outcomes (all p > 0.05). In exploratory subgroup analyses, PP showed a positive effect in male-only studies (g = 0.29, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.56, p = 0.04), but the interaction with mixed-sex studies was not significant (p = 0.11). Beetroot and nitrate salts did not differ in VO2max. And trim-and-fill imputed five studies, reducing this estimate to zero. Subgroup analyses by sport type and exercise type (endurance, intermittent team sports, strength/power) revealed no significant differences. Conclusions: Dietary nitrate supplementation produced no statistically significant pooled ergogenic effects in athletes. Any potential benefit appears small and context-dependent, and the possible role of vascular endothelial function in high-performance athletes warrants further investigation. The absence of statistically significant effects should not be regarded as definitive evidence of no effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: