Background Students with learning disabilities may experience difficulties in understanding abstract scientific concepts and terminology and relating them to everyday life. The Grade 4 Food unit provides a relevant context for examining these learning experiences because its content can be closely connected to familiar everday life.Purpose The aim of this study is to explore the views of teachers and students with learning disabilities on the Grade 4 Food unit. Using an embedded single-case study design, the teaching and learning process of the Grade 4 Food unit and the related instructional practices and assessment practices were examined holistically.Sample Data were collected from 10 teachers and 10 students with learning disabilities selected through criterion sampling.Design and Methods Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Thematic analysis was used in an inductive approach to analyze the data.Results The findings showed that students with learning disabilities learned about foods within the framework of the food groups they encountered in everyday life. They had limitations and conceptual deficiencies in relating nutrients to everyday foods. In this context, students with learning disabilities struggled to grasp the science terminology required for the Food unit. Although teachers reported efforts to connect concepts with everyday life examples, students’ responses continued to reflect difficulties in linking these examples to scientific concepts and terminology. In addition, there were deficiencies in the teachers’ use of instructional adaptations in the teaching process.Conclusion These findings contribute to science education research by highlighting the relationship among students’ conceptual difficulties, everyday life connections, and teachers’ reported instructional practices in the Grade 4 Food unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pürsün et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: