Key result
Admission QTc shows no correlation with post-PCI corrected TIMI frame count in STEMI.
Why the study?
Corrected QT interval (QTc) is associated with myocardial ischemia and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its relationship with corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI remained unclear.
Does admission corrected QT interval (QTc) correlate with post-procedural corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Observational (n=133)
No
Does admission corrected QT interval (QTc) correlate with post-procedural corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Effect estimate: r = -0.020
p-value: p=0.816
Admission QTc interval is not associated with post-PCI coronary flow velocity (CTFC) in STEMI patients, whereas neutrophil and lymphocyte counts show weak correlations supporting the role of systemic inflammation in microvascular perfusion.
Objective: Corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) is a quantitative angiographic method for assessing coronary flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Corrected QT interval (QTc) is associated with myocardial ischemia and adverse cardiovascular outcomes; however, its relationship with CTFC remains unclear. This study evaluated the relationship between QTc interval and CTFC in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Methods: This retrospective study included 133 STEMI patients who underwent successful primary PCI. Clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic, and angiographic data were analyzed. QTc interval was calculated from admission electrocardiograms, and coronary flow was assessed by post-procedural CTFC. Correlations between CTFC and study variables were analyzed using Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The mean age was 56±12 years, and 80.5% were male. The mean QTc interval was 457.46±55.92 ms, and the mean CTFC value was 35.78±22.99. No significant relationship was observed between QTc interval and CTFC (r=-0.020; p=0.816). Among laboratory parameters, only neutrophil count showed a positive correlation with CTFC (r=0.177; p=0.042), whereas lymphocyte count showed a negative correlation with CTFC (r=-0.178; p=0.040). No significant relationship was found between CTFC and other clinical, laboratory, or procedural variables. Conclusion: This finding suggests that the QTc interval may not be a reliable indicator of post-procedural coronary flow as assessed by CTFC. However, the association of neutrophil and lymphocyte counts with CTFC supports the role of inflammation in coronary microvascular perfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Opan et al. (2026) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n=133). Admission corrected QT interval (QTc) was evaluated on Post-procedural corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (CTFC) (r = -0.020, p=0.816). Admission corrected QT interval (QTc) showed no significant correlation with post-procedural corrected TIMI frame count (r=-0.020, p=0.816) in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: