In the era of a burgeoning digital economy, data elements have emerged as pivotal drivers in advancing agricultural digital transformation. This study examines the integration mechanisms of data elements in agriculture through a tripartite evolutionary game model that encompasses government agencies, agricultural technology enterprises, and agricultural operators. Employing stability analysis on strategically selected representative factors, we derive critical insights: (1) The optimal government subsidy coefficient should remain below 0.5, as excessive subsidies (β ≥ 0.5) impose unsustainable fiscal burdens while failing to effectively stimulate agricultural data utilization. (2) Agricultural operators’ digital literacy exhibits a positive correlation with their willingness to participate. When operator literacy is high (α > 0.5), they are more likely to participate in agricultural data utilization. (3) Strategic interactions reveal that governments tend to initiate guidance when operator literacy is low (θ < 0.5), whereas technology enterprises adopt passive strategies under similar conditions. (4) A critical threshold of 5 for project entrustment fees governs tripartite decision-making: exceeding this value triggers government disengagement, subsequently leading to corporate passivity and operator non-participation. (5) Low digital literacy weakens the effectiveness of high-subsidy policies, respectively, leading agricultural technology enterprises and agricultural operating entities to tend towards passively leading and not participating in agricultural data utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: