This study aimed to characterize the volatile and fatty acid constituents of S. peruviana and investigate their potential anti‐inflammatory mechanisms. Volatile compounds were identified by headspace solid‐phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS‐SPME‐GC–MS), whereas fatty acids were analyzed by GC–MS following derivatization. The identified phytochemicals were subjected to target prediction, followed by protein–protein interaction (PPI), Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses, and molecular docking. HS‐SPME‐GC–MS analysis identified 11 volatile compounds, predominantly hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (48.4%) and dihydroactinidiolide (23.5%), followed by dehydro‐β‐ionone (5.6%), 2‐methylbutanal (5.5%), and 3‐methylbutanal (5.1%). Fatty acid profiling revealed palmitic acid as the predominant fatty acid (47.7%), followed by α‐linolenic acid (29.9%), linoleic acid (11.6%), and stearic acid (10.8%). Network pharmacology identified 253 overlapping targets between phytochemical‐associated proteins and inflammation‐related genes, with TNF, IL1B, PTGS2, EGFR, STAT3, and PPARG emerging as the principal hub proteins. KEGG enrichment analysis revealed significant enrichment in inflammation‐associated pathways, including NF‐κB, IL‐17, NOD‐like receptor, and advanced glycation end‐products (AGE)‐receptor for advanced glycation end‐products (RAGE) signaling pathways. Molecular docking predicted interactions between the major phytochemicals and the selected targets, with palmitic acid showing the lowest predicted binding energy for COX‐2 (−7.0 kcal/mol), while hexahydrofarnesyl acetone and stearic acid showed the lowest predicted binding energies for PPARγ (−8.3 kcal/mol).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zatout et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from ChemistryOpen