Key result
Coronary microvascular dysfunction promotes upstream epicardial atherosclerosis by impairing distal runoff and reducing shear stress.
Why the study?
The traditional epicardial plaque-centric framework has limitations, and increasing evidence suggests that myocardial coronary microvascular disease may represent an upstream determinant of epicardial atherogenesis.
This narrative review synthesizes experimental, clinical, and multimodality imaging evidence suggesting that coronary microvascular disease may act as an upstream determinant of epicardial atherogenesis by increasing microvascular resistance and lowering upstream wall shear stress.
CMD may precede epicardial atherogenesis; leaves open whether microvascular-targeted interventions alter plaque progression.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading global health burden despite major advances in prevention and treatment, highlighting limitations of the traditional epicardial plaque-centric framework. Increasing evidence suggests that myocardial coronary microvascular disease (CMD) may represent an upstream determinant of atherogenesis. This review synthesizes experimental, clinical, and imaging data supporting the hypothesis that microvascular dysfunction may contribute to the initiation and progression of epicardial atherosclerosis. The latter may, in turn, contribute to CMD, and the relationship between the two compartments is best understood as bidirectional rather than strictly unidirectional. Mechanistically, microvascular dysfunction increases coronary resistance and impairs distal runoff, leading to alterations in wall shear stress that may promote endothelial dysfunction, lipid infiltration, and plaque development in upstream epicardial vessels. Experimental models demonstrate that microvascular abnormalities often precede overt macrovascular disease, while multimodality imaging studies consistently show impaired myocardial perfusion and reduced coronary flow reserve in the absence of obstructive CAD. These functional abnormalities are strongly associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The frequent discordance between perfusion deficits and epicardial stenosis further supports a central role for microvascular dysfunction in ischemic heart disease. Collectively, these findings challenge a purely anatomical framework and highlight the value of quantitative imaging of coronary flow and perfusion for disease characterization and risk stratification. A shift toward a microvascular-centered paradigm may enable earlier detection, improve phenotyping, and inform targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salameh et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary microvascular disease and epicardial coronary artery disease. Coronary microvascular dysfunction was evaluated on Initiation and progression of epicardial atherosclerosis and altered wall shear stress. Coronary microvascular dysfunction increases coronary resistance and impairs distal runoff, reducing wall shear stress and promoting upstream epicardial atherogenesis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: