Cu–Cr–Zr alloys must combine high strength with high electrical conductivity. Reaching both at once is slow: equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) consumes many passes, and aging adds a further hour at temperature. Here a pulsed electromagnetic load was superimposed on ECAP (EMPF-ECAP) for a Cu–0.239Cr–0.126Zr alloy, and the microstructure, hardness and conductivity were compared with conventional ECAP at the same pass numbers. Four EMPF-ECAP passes raised the as-deformed hardness to 170.89 HV, above the 147.51 HV of four conventional passes. Aging at 450 °C for 0.5 h then gave a peak of 207.16 HV and 79.12%IACS. The conventional route required six passes and 1 h to reach 200.09 HV and 80.71%IACS. Electron backscatter diffraction indicates why. At a comparable grain size (8.68 against 8.99 µm), the pulsed specimens retained a lower recrystallized fraction, 20.3% against 39.4%. More of their deformation substructure survived aging, and the high-angle boundary fraction was lower, 54.7% against 81.8%. Compared with conventional ECAP, EMPF-ECAP reduced the number of passes from six to four and the aging time from 1 h to 0.5 h, reaching the same hardness in half the aging time with about 1.6%IACS lower conductivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: