Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABSTRACT & AUTHOR'S NOTE This paper presents a pioneering cross-disciplinary analysis at the intersection of evolutionary cybernetics, game theory, and macroeconomic modeling. The author introduces a proprietary "bio-cybernetic" definition of the Rational Mind—the LPS model (Logic, Prediction, Systems Thinking)—establishing a rigorous baseline for comparing AI capabilities with human cognition. This framework serves as a theoretical foundation for engineering advanced intelligence systems capable of providing strategic, far-sighted guidance rather than merely operating on statistical and lexical patterns. The study outlines the disruptive role of modern digital marketing in driving the global economy through a series of algorithmic transitions (from B2C/B2B to A2C and A2A models). The author substantiates the macroeconomic trend and version that competitive forces under the "Prisoner's Dilemma" inevitably lead to the collapse of the classic market economy and its structural transformation into a new macroeconomic paradigm: the society of Automated Communism. Because the total automation of strategic choices eliminates traditional market mechanisms, replacing them with a closed, autonomous distribution matrix of goods between algorithms for Homo semisapiens (the actual state of mind of most people according to the LPS model). This publication is an authorized author’s translation from the original Ukrainian, prepared by the author with minor updates and conceptual clarifications, and enhanced in synergy with advanced Artificial Intelligence language tools for linguistic optimization. The original Ukrainian paper is commissioned by the leading Ukrainian professional journal "Marketing and Advertising" (Маркетинг і Реклама). To preserve the scientific context, the published journal version is appended directly following the English text in this single PDF document immediately after its official publication in November 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roman Kolyadyuk (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: