Background Inadequate access to laboratory resources in remote secondary schools hinders efficient chemistry learning, highlighting the prospects of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) technologies to enhance project-oriented learning.Purpose This study investigates the effectiveness of integrating virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) technologies into project-based chemistry learning in rural secondary schools with limited laboratory resources.Sample A quasi-experimental design with supplementary survey data was employed, comprising 64 upper-secondary students (32 in the control group and 32 in the experimental group) who participated in the intervention.Design and methods The experimental group engaged in VR/AR-supported environmental chemistry projects, whereas the control group received conventional instruction. Academic achievement, learning motivation, and perceived understanding were evaluated utilizing achievement tests and Likert-type scales. At the same time, supplementary descriptive survey items were used to contextualize students’ experiences of chemistry instruction and VR/AR-supported learning.Results The results indicated that students in the experimental group demonstrated substantially greater improvement in achievement (mean gain = 19) than the control group (mean gain = 3), with a large standardized post-test difference between groups (Cohen’s d = 0.89). Also, students in the experimental group exhibited increases in motivation and perceived understanding after the VR/AR-supported intervention. A strong positive relationship was observed between learning motivation and perceived understanding (r = 0.68, p < .001).Conclusion The findings suggest that VR/AR-supported project-based learning may be a promising pedagogical approach for enhancing chemistry education in resource-constrained rural contexts. This study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence for the use of immersive technologies as a compensatory supplement to traditional laboratory instruction, particularly in settings with limited access to physical resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shertayeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: