Key result
Abnormal exercise E/e'–CO slope is linked to ~9-point higher death or hospitalization.
Why the study?
Because pulmonary vascular pressures are flow-dependent, flow-corrected indices such as the E/e'-cardiac output slope during exercise Doppler echocardiography may better discriminate normal from abnormal left ventricular diastolic responses. The functional significance and prognostic impact of this slope across different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors required investigation.
Does an abnormal exercise echocardiography-derived E/e'–CO slope (≥0.6) predict a higher risk of death or hospitalization in patients with different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors?
Cohort (n=478)
Does an abnormal exercise echocardiography-derived E/e'–CO slope (≥0.6) predict a higher risk of death or hospitalization in patients with different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An abnormal exercise echocardiography-derived E/e'–CO slope (≥0.6) identifies patients with worse cardiac functional and hemodynamic impairment and significantly higher rates of death or hospitalization over long-term follow-up.
Background Pulmonary vascular pressures are flow-dependent, with invasively determined upper limits of normal pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) defined by a PAWP–cardiac output (CO) relationship of approximately 2 mmHg/L/min. Accordingly, flow-corrected indices such as the ratio of mitral Doppler E to tissue Doppler e' waves (E/e’) to CO slope during exercise Doppler echocardiography (ex-TTE) may better discriminate normal from abnormal left ventricle (LV) diastolic response to exercise. Purpose To investigate the functional significance and the prognostic impact of the ex-TTE derived E/e′–CO slope in patients with different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The study population included 478 patients (mean age±SD = 61 ± 13 years; 236 females) with different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors enrolled in the RIGHT-NET registry (Table 1). All participants underwent resting and ex-TTE using a semi-recumbent cycle ergometer with incremental workloads of 25 Watts every 2 minutes until maximal tolerated effort. LV diastolic measurements were obtained at rest and during mid-level exercise (heart rate ≤110 bpm), prior to E and A wave fusion. The E/e′ ratio was calculated using the average of septal and lateral e′ velocities. CO was derived from left ventricular outflow tract diameter and Doppler flow-velocity measurements. The E/e′–CO slope was calculated from the change in E/e′ relative to the change in CO between rest and exercise. An abnormal E/e′–CO slope was defined as ≥0.6, based on prior validation. Results An abnormal E/e′–CO slope ≥0.6 (Group 1) was present in 125 patients, while 353 patients had a normal slope <0.6 (Group 2). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 patients were older, more frequently female, and had a higher prevalence of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. They also exhibited lower hemoglobin levels, higher creatinine, more elevated NT-proBNP or BNP concentrations and pronounced cardiac structural, functional, and hemodynamic abnormalities at rest and at peak exercise (Table 1). During a median follow-up of 2544 days, 29 deaths and 16 hospitalizations occurred among 446 patients with available follow-up data. The cumulative incidence of the combined endpoint of death or hospitalization was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (16.2% [19/117] vs. 7.0% [23/329], p = 0.006). Patients with an E/e′–CO slope ≥0.6 demonstrated significantly higher hospitalization rates and reduced survival (Figure 1). Conclusions In patients with different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors, exercise-induced LV diastolic dysfunction, defined by an abnormal ex-TTE derived E/e′–CO slope, is associated with a poorer clinical phenotype, more severe cardiac structural, functional, and hemodynamic impairment, and an adverse prognosis, with higher rates of death and hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrara et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Different clinical conditions and cardiovascular risk factors (n=478). Abnormal exercise E/e'–CO slope (≥0.6) vs. Normal exercise E/e'–CO slope (<0.6) was evaluated on Combined endpoint of death or hospitalization (p=0.006). An abnormal exercise E/e'–CO slope was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of death or hospitalization compared to a normal slope.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: