Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: A bidirectional relation exists between acute infection and immobilization, and both are triggers for venous thromboembolism (VTE). To what extent the association between infection and VTE-risk is explained by immobilization is unknown. AIMS: To investigate the impact of hospitalization with acute infection on the VTE-risk in patients with and without concomitant immobilization, and to explore the differential impact of respiratory- (RTI) and urinary- (UTI) tract infections on the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We conducted a case-crossover study of VTE-patients (n = 707) recruited from a general population. Hospitalizations and VTE-triggers were registered during the 90 days before a VTE (hazard period) and in four preceding 90-day control periods. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for VTE according to triggers. RESULTS: Acute infection was registered in 267 (37.8%) of the hazard periods and in 107 (3.8%) of the control periods, corresponding to a high VTE-risk after infection (OR 24.2, 95% CI 17.2-34.0), that was attenuated to 15-fold increased after adjustment for immobilization. The risk was 20-fold increased after infection without concomitant immobilization, 73-fold increased after immobilization without infection, and 141-fold increased with the two combined. The risk of PE was apparently higher after RTIs (OR 48.3, 95% CI 19.4-120.0) than UTIs (OR 12.6, 95% CI 6.4-24.7), but diminished in sensitivity analyses excluding uncertain RTI diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that hospitalization with infection is a strong VTE-trigger also in non-immobilized patients. Infection and immobilization had a synergistic effect on the VTE-risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grimnes et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: