Key result
High-admitting ED clinician care fails to reduce subsequent AMI hospitalizations compared to low-admitting clinicians.
Why the study?
The practice of hospitalizing emergency department patients with chest pain after ruling out acute myocardial infarction varies widely, and the long-term outcome and cost implications of this variation were uncertain.
Does evaluation by high-admitting emergency clinicians reduce 30-day and 180-day subsequent acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations compared to low-admitting clinicians in adults presenting to the ED with chest pain?
Cohort (n=223,569)
Yes
Does evaluation by high-admitting emergency clinicians reduce 30-day and 180-day subsequent acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations compared to low-admitting clinicians in adults presenting to the ED with chest pain?
Higher clinician hospitalization tendencies for ED chest pain lead to increased downstream cardiac testing, coronary interventions, and healthcare costs without reducing 30- or 180-day subsequent AMI hospitalizations.
Background: The practice of hospitalizing emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain after ruling out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varies widely. The long-term outcome and cost implications of this variation are uncertain. Methods: Analyzing 2007-2021 claims from a national commercial insurer, we identified 223,569 adults (≥18 years) ED visits with a principal diagnosis of chest pain without major secondary cardiopulmonary diagnoses, seen by 19,001 clinicians in 2,273 EDs. Within each ED, clinicians with the highest and lowest terciles of risk-adjusted hospitalization rates were classified as high-versus low-admitting. Primary outcomes were 30-and 180-day subsequent AMI hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included 7-day cardiac testing, 30-day coronary intervention, and 30-day total and out-of-pocket costs. We estimated adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and relative cost differences using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for patient and visit characteristics. Results: Patients had a mean age of 48.6 years, and 53.9% were female; measured characteristics were similar between groups. Compared with low-admitting clinicians, visits to high-admitting clinicians had higher 7-day cardiac testing (13.1% vs 10.8%; aRR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17-1.27) and 30-day coronary interventions (4.3% vs 3.8%; aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23). AMI hospitalization did not differ at 30 days (0.60% vs 0.60%; aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84-1.15) or 180 days (0.85% vs 0.87%; aRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85-1.10). Thirty-day total costs were higher after visits to high-admitting clinicians (relative change 11.3%, 95% CI 8.8-13.8), and out-of-pocket costs ≥$1,000 were more common (32.0% vs 29.6%; relative change 8.2%, 95% CI 6.1-10.3). Conclusions: Higher clinician hospitalizing tendency for ED chest pain is associated with greater downstream testing, more coronary interventions, and higher costs without lower short-or intermediate-term AMI risk. Reducing marginal admissions among high-admitting clinicians may decrease spending and practice variation with minimal impact on AMI outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chou et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Emergency department chest pain without major secondary cardiopulmonary diagnoses (n=223,569). High-admitting emergency clinicians (highest tercile of risk-adjusted hospitalization rates) vs. Low-admitting emergency clinicians (lowest tercile of risk-adjusted hospitalization rates) was evaluated on 30-day and 180-day subsequent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalizations (aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84-1.15). Care by high-admitting ED clinicians did not reduce 30-day (aRR 1.00; 95% CI 0.84-1.15) or 180-day (aRR 0.97; 95% CI 0.85-1.10) subsequent AMI hospitalizations compared with low-admitting clinicians.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: