Key result
Qiliqiangxin cuts CV death or HF hospitalization ~16% vs placebo in HFrEF, regardless of ARNI use.
Why the study?
New treatments providing added benefit in HFrEF are needed despite recent advances, and the efficacy and safety of the Traditional Chinese Medicine Qiliqiangxin according to baseline sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) use versus non-use required evaluation.
Does Qiliqiangxin reduce the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFrEF according to baseline sacubitril/valsartan use?
RCT (n=3,110)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
Does Qiliqiangxin reduce the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with HFrEF according to baseline sacubitril/valsartan use?
In patients with HFrEF, adding Qiliqiangxin to standard therapy reduces the composite risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization regardless of baseline sacubitril/valsartan use, with an acceptable safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adding Qiliqiangxin to GDMT in HFrEF regardless of ARNI; extends QUEST RCT benefit to ARNI-treated patients.
Background Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality globally, despite recent advances in therapy, and new treatments that have added benefit are still needed. Qiliqiangxin (QLQX), a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formulation, has demonstrated benefits in HFrEF. Here, we examine its efficacy and safety added to the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sacubitril/valsartan. Purpose The randomized, placebo-controlled QUEST Trial demonstrated a reduction in mortality and morbidity with QLQX in patients with HFrEF. In the present subgroup analysis, we examined the efficacy and safety of QLQX according to use versus non-use of ARNI therapy at baseline. Methods A total of 3,110 patients were analysed, of whom 1,770 (57%) were on ARNI at baseline. Patients were randomized to QLQX or placebo. Key efficacy outcomes included the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization (primary endpoint), along with the individual components of the composite and biomarker changes. Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) reporting. Results Baseline use of β-blockers, MRAs, and diuretics was high (>80% in both groups). Triple therapy (ARNI/ACEi/ARB + β-blocker + MRA) was more common in ARNI users (76.2% vs. 41.4%), while SGLT2i use was lower (3.9% vs. 11.9%). The primary composite outcome was significantly reduced with QLQX compared to placebo, both in ARNI users (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70–1.00) and non-users (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.95; interaction p=0.55). QLQX reduced HF hospitalization consistently in ARNI users (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.96) and non-users (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58–1.03; interaction p=0.94). There was a suggestion of possible heterogeneity in treatment effect of QLQX on CV death: HR in ARNI users 0.99 (95% CI 0.77–1.28) versus HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.53–0.94) in non-ARNI users; interaction p=0.08. Rates of total AEs and discontinuation due to AEs with QLQX versus placebo were similar between ARNI users and non-ARNI users. Conclusions In patients with HFrEF treated with ARNI, the addition of QLQX significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, with a acceptable safety profile. These findings support the potential role of QLQX as an adjunct to standard therapy in HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=3,110). Qiliqiangxin (QLQX) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.00). Qiliqiangxin reduced CV death or HF hospitalization vs placebo in HFrEF patients both with and without baseline ARNI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: