Key result
Intravenous HRS-9057 achieves greater weight loss than tolvaptan with comparable safety and no serious adverse events.
Why the study?
Arginine vasopressin contributes to fluid retention in heart failure, and preclinical and early-phase studies of the AVP V2 receptor antagonist HRS-9057 indicated a diuretic effect and favorable safety profile, warranting clinical evaluation in CHF with persistent volume overload despite prior non-V2 antagonist diuretic therapy.
Does intravenous HRS-9057 demonstrate favorable safety, tolerability, and decongestive efficacy compared with oral tolvaptan in congestive heart failure patients with persistent volume overload despite prior non-V2 antagonist diuretic therapy?
RCT (n=25)
Open-label
9:3 per cohort
Does intravenous HRS-9057 demonstrate favorable safety, tolerability, and decongestive efficacy compared with oral tolvaptan in congestive heart failure patients with persistent volume overload despite prior non-V2 antagonist diuretic therapy?
In this Phase 1b study of CHF patients with persistent volume overload, intravenous HRS-9057 was well tolerated with no serious adverse events and showed a trend toward greater body weight reduction and sustained negative fluid balance compared with oral tolvaptan.
HRS-9057 yielded greater weight reduction than tolvaptan with no SAEs in Phase 1b RCT; extends aquaresis data in HF volume overload pending larger trials.
Background Arginine vasopressin (AVP) contributes to fluid retention in heart failure (HF). HRS-9057 is an AVP V2 receptor antagonist that promotes aquaresis with minimal electrolyte loss. Preclinical and early-phase studies have indicated a diuretic effect and favorable safety profile. Purpose This Phase 1b study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of intravenous HRS-9057 versus oral tolvaptan in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients with persistent volume overload despite prior non-V2 antagonist diuretic therapy. Methods In this open-label, active-controlled, dose-escalation Phase 1b study, two dose cohorts were planned. For each cohort, 12 CHF patients with persistent volume overload despite prior non-V2 antagonist diuretic therapy were randomized (9:3) to receive once-daily intravenous infusion of HRS-9057 administered over 1 hour (15 mg or 30 mg) or oral tolvaptan 15 mg for 7 days. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled and treated (HRS-9057 15 mg, n = 9; 30 mg, n = 10; tolvaptan 15 mg, n = 6). Mean body weight reductions from baseline at Day 8 were -1.81 and -2.82 kg with HRS-9057 at 15 and 30 mg, compared to -1.40 kg with tolvaptan. An earlier onset of weight reduction was observed in both HRS-9057 groups compared to tolvaptan (Figure 1). By Day 8, lower limb edema resolved in 9/9 (100%), 8/9 (88.9%), and 3/5 (60.0%) of patients in the HRS-9057 15 mg, 30 mg, and tolvaptan groups, respectively. Pulmonary rales resolution was observed in 1/2 (50.0%), 3/3 (100%), and 3/4 (75.0%), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 9 (100%), 8 (80.0%) and 6 (100%) of patients in the HRS-9057 15 mg, 30 mg, and tolvaptan groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild in severity, and no serious adverse events occurred. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included dry mouth (66.7%, 40.0%, 33.3%), increased alanine aminotransferase (33.3%, 10.0%, 0.0%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (22.2%, 10.0%, 0.0%), electrocardiogram QT prolonged (33.3%, 0.0%, 16.7%) and hypernatremia (0.0%, 20.0%, 0.0%). Following 1-hour intravenous infusion, median Tmax of HRS-9057 was 1 hour, and geometric mean t1/2 was 2–3 hours. The plasma exposure increased approximately proportionally from 15 to 30 mg doses. Steady state was achieved after 3 days of dosing, with minimal accumulation. Both HRS-9057 groups maintained a negative fluid balance throughout the 7-day treatment, whereas the tolvaptan group exhibited a negative balance only on Day 1 (Figure 2). Comparable elevations in serum sodium were observed across all groups, with values remaining within the normal range. Conclusion In CHF patients with persistent volume overload, intravenous HRS-9057 showed a trend toward greater body weight reduction and decongestive effects compared with oral tolvaptan, with no new safety concerns.Figure 1Figure 2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Congestive heart failure with persistent volume overload (n=25). Intravenous HRS-9057 vs. Oral tolvaptan 15 mg once daily was evaluated on Safety and tolerability (treatment-emergent adverse events). Intravenous HRS-9057 (15 and 30 mg) reduced Day 8 weight by -1.81 and -2.82 kg vs -1.40 kg with oral tolvaptan, with TEAEs in 100% and 80% vs 100% and no serious adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: