Key result
Dapagliflozin 5 mg improves hierarchical HF outcomes ~3.8-fold over control in T2DM with chronic HF.
Why the study?
Although dapagliflozin 10 mg is known to improve clinical outcomes in heart failure, evidence supporting low-dose dapagliflozin (5 mg) in patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus remains limited.
Does low-dose dapagliflozin (5 mg) improve hierarchical heart failure-related outcomes compared with control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=266)
Open-label
Randomized
Yes
Does low-dose dapagliflozin (5 mg) improve hierarchical heart failure-related outcomes compared with control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic heart failure?
In patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure, low-dose dapagliflozin (5 mg) significantly improved a hierarchical composite of heart failure-related outcomes, driven by reductions in heart failure hospitalization frequency and medical therapy escalation.
Supports low-dose dapagliflozin in T2DM with chronic HF; extends 10 mg RCT evidence to 5 mg dosing.
Background The efficacy of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure (HF) has been well established. Dapagliflozin 10 mg has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in HF in DAPA-HF and DELIVER; however, evidence supporting low-dose dapagliflozin in HF remains limited. Purpose This post hoc analysis of the DAPPER study aims to assess the effect of dapagliflozin 5 mg on HF-related events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic heart failure (CHF). Methods The DAPPER study was a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial that enrolled patients with T2DM and CHF, randomly assigned to dapagliflozin (n = 146) or control (n = 148) and followed for 96 weeks. This subanalysis included 128 patients who received dapagliflozin 5 mg throughout the study and 138 control patients. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite consisting of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization frequency, time to first HF hospitalization and escalation of HF medical therapy, assessed using the win ratio approach. Results The primary win ratio analysis favored dapagliflozin, which was superior in 19.34% of paired comparisons compared with 5.04% for control, yielding a win ratio of 3.84 (95% CI, 1.92–10.17; permutation P < 0.001). Dapagliflozin significantly reduced the frequency of HF hospitalizations (rate ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05–0.85; P = 0.03) and escalation of HF medical therapy (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11–0.58; P = 0.001). Conclusions In patients with T2DM and CHF, dapagliflozin 5 mg was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in hierarchical HF-related outcomes compared with control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=266). Dapagliflozin vs. Control was evaluated on Hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization frequency, time to first HF hospitalization, and escalation of HF medical therapy (Win ratio 3.84, 95% CI 1.92-10.17, p=<0.001). Dapagliflozin 5 mg improved hierarchical HF-related outcomes vs control in patients with T2DM and chronic HF (win ratio 3.84; 95% CI 1.92-10.17; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: