Key result
Endurance training improves 5-km times by ~8%, driven by ventilatory threshold rather than VO2peak.
Why the study?
Performance improvement in endurance running is commonly attributed to increases in VO2peak and central cardiopulmonary adaptations, but the relative contribution of ventilatory thresholds and submaximal efficiency in recreational athletes remains unclear.
Cohort (n=44)
In recreational runners, 18-month improvements in 5-km race times are driven by upward shifts in submaximal ventilatory and anaerobic thresholds rather than increases in central cardiopulmonary parameters like VO₂peak.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performance gains may decouple from VO2peak in runners; challenges central adaptation models and leaves open threshold mechanisms for study.
Background / Introduction Performance improvement in endurance running is commonly attributed to increases in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak) and central cardiopulmonary adaptations. However, the relative contribution of ventilatory thresholds and submaximal efficiency to performance gains in recreational athletes remains unclear. Purpose To determine whether improvements in 5-km race performance over 18 months are associated with changes in VO₂peak and other CPET-derived central parameters in recreational runners. Methods We conducted a prospective longitudinal study including 44 healthy recreational runners (19 women), aged 18–41 years, followed for 18 months. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was performed at baseline and at months 6, 12, and 18, one week prior to standardized 5-km urban races. Only athletes demonstrating >1-minute improvement per race were included. Variables analyzed included VO₂peak, VE/VCO₂ slope, oxygen pulse, ventilatory thresholds, and weekly training load (MET-min/week). Repeated-measures analysis and correlation testing were performed. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results Race performance improved progressively: 3.6% (±1.1), 5.1% (±0.6), and 7.9% (±2.9) across intervals (p<0.001 for trend). VO₂peak showed minimal changes: 0.6%, 0.2%, 0.5%, and 0.4% across evaluations (NS). No significant correlation was observed between race time improvement and VO₂peak change, either individually or in pooled analysis (r≈0, p=NS). VE/VCO₂ slope and oxygen pulse demonstrated negligible variation (Δ ≤0.5, NS). Training load increased progressively (685±68, 709±95, 844±214, 982±315 MET-min/week; p<0.01). In contrast, the first ventilatory threshold increased consistently (4.5%, 6.5%, 9.2%, 13.8%; p<0.001), as did the anaerobic threshold (1.9%, 3.8%, 4.4%, 9.4%; p<0.01). The second ventilatory threshold remained stable (NS). Conclusion In recreational runners, progressive improvement in 5-km performance over 18 months was not associated with meaningful changes in VO₂peak, VE/VCO₂ slope, or oxygen pulse. Performance gains were primarily linked to upward displacement of submaximal ventilatory thresholds, suggesting that improvements in metabolic efficiency and peripheral adaptation, rather than central cardiopulmonary capacity, drive endurance performance enhancement in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H Radillo (2026) conducted a cohort in Healthy recreational endurance runners (n=44). Progressive endurance running training vs. Baseline performance was evaluated on Correlation between 5-km race performance improvement and changes in VO2peak and ventilatory thresholds (r ≈ 0, p=<0.001 for trend). Endurance training over 18 months improved 5-km race times by up to 7.9% (p<0.001) via higher first ventilatory thresholds (up to 13.8%, p<0.001) rather than VO2peak changes (r≈0, p=NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: