Key result
Endotoxin-tolerance protects cardiac allografts from acute rejection by driving M2 macrophage polarization.
Why the study?
Despite advances in pharmacologic immunosuppression, long-term morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation remain high, motivating the search for more efficient immunosuppressive regimens.
Does endotoxin-tolerance conditioning and infusion of endotoxin-educated bone marrow mitigate acute immune rejection and improve allograft survival in murine heart transplantation models?
Does endotoxin-tolerance conditioning and infusion of endotoxin-educated bone marrow mitigate acute immune rejection and improve allograft survival in murine heart transplantation models?
Endotoxin-tolerance induces epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming in macrophages toward a reparative CD206+ M2 phenotype, offering a potential T-cell-independent strategy to mitigate acute cardiac allograft rejection.
Background Heart transplantation is the golden therapeutic option that prolongs the life of numerous patients with terminal heart failure. Despite advances in pharmacologic immunosuppression, long-term morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing heart transplantation remain high. In this study, we seek to a more efficient immunosuppressive regimens in heart transplantation. Methods We combined endotoxin-tolerance with murine transplant models (C57BL/6J, CAG-Cre; R26-tdTomato, CCR2-/-, TLR4-/- mice), and evaluated serum cardiac troponin I levels, echocardiography, and survival analysis of allografts. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing to profile the transcriptional landscapes of allografts, as well as quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, Elisa, IHC and whole-mount staining to characterize cellular composition and communication. We performed BMDM (bone marrow-derived macrophage) endotoxin-tolerance model in vitro. Following the instructions of the Agilent Seahorse XFe24 kit, the mitochondrial function was analyzed. By reconstituting irradiated C57BL/6J mice with whole bone marrow from CAG-Cre; R26-tdTomato mice (Endotoxin-tolerance or not), chimeras were generated. Subsequently, C57BL/6J mice received an infusion of endotoxin-educated or non-educated bone marrow before the heart transplantation. We systematically analyzed human cardiac allograft atlas of patients. Results Here, we showed that endotoxin exposure had a cardioprotective effect manifested as the better angiogenic ability and more intact myocardial architecture against acute immune rejection of cardiac allografts. This protective phenotype is marked by an enriched population of CD206+ M2 macrophages in endotoxin-treated allografts, which indicated a M1 to M2 transition. The immune tolerance initiated an epigenetic and metabolic shift within allografts. Epigenetically imprinted macrophages significantly mitigate myocardial rejection. Through the multi-omics integration of our established heart transplantation biobank of human and mouse, we decoded the landscapes governing this tolerance-driven heart protection. Conclusions Our study unveils a new strategy for mitigating rejection, diverging from conventional immunosuppressive paradigms that primarily antagonize T cell-mediated adaptive responses. Our findings offer a promising therapy for longevity of cardiac allografts without long-time use of immunosuppressants, offering a more durable alternative for clinical translation in patients with end-stage heart failure.Figure 1.Graphical Abstract.Figure 2.reparative macrophage polarization
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied Heart transplantation / Acute immune rejection. Endotoxin-tolerance / Endotoxin-educated bone marrow infusion vs. Non-educated bone marrow / Control was evaluated on Acute immune rejection of cardiac allografts, angiogenic ability, and myocardial architecture. Endotoxin-tolerance protected cardiac allografts against acute rejection by enriching CD206+ M2 macrophages and driving an M1-to-M2 epigenetic and metabolic shift.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: