Key result
Japanese diet salt checklist correlates with urine-estimated intake in HF, driven by HFpEF.
Why the study?
Practical tools to quantify habitual salt intake in routine clinical practice for HF management remain limited, particularly for capturing sodium sources characteristic of Japanese dietary patterns.
Does a Japanese diet-specific salt checklist accurately estimate habitual salt intake compared to spot urine-estimated salt intake in ambulatory patients with prior heart failure hospitalization?
Cohort (n=174)
Does a Japanese diet-specific salt checklist accurately estimate habitual salt intake compared to spot urine-estimated salt intake in ambulatory patients with prior heart failure hospitalization?
A culturally tailored Japanese diet-specific salt checklist demonstrates valid correlation with urine-estimated salt intake in ambulatory HFpEF patients, offering a practical tool for outpatient dietary sodium assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support checklist validation for salt intake in HFpEF; leaves open superiority to standard tools before clinical adoption.
Background Dietary sodium restriction is widely recommended in heart failure (HF) management (1); however, practical tools to quantify habitual salt intake in routine clinical practice remain limited, particularly within Japanese dietary patterns. Conventional assessment methods may not adequately capture sodium sources characteristic of Japanese cuisine, including soy sauce–based seasonings and miso soup. Purpose To prospectively evaluate the construct validity of a Japanese diet–specific salt checklist (2) against urine-estimated salt intake and to examine whether associations differ according to ejection fraction (EF) phenotype and loop diuretic use. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of ambulatory HF patients with prior hospitalization. At baseline, salt checklist scores and urine-estimated salt intake from spot urine were obtained. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman correlation and regression analyses per 1-SD increase in score. Patients were stratified by EF (<50% vs ≥50%) and loop diuretic use. Interaction models evaluated effect modification. Results Among 174 patients, the salt checklist score showed a modest but significant correlation with urine-estimated salt intake (ρ=0.214, p=0.005). Median estimated salt intake increased stepwise across score tertiles (Low 7.9 g, Mid 8.3 g, High 9.1 g; Kruskal–Wallis p=0.011), supporting discriminative capacity. In EF-stratified analyses, HFpEF (EF ≥50%; n=128) demonstrated a significant correlation (ρ=0.332, p<0.001), whereas HFrEF (EF <50%) showed no significant association (ρ=−0.125, p=0.41). The interaction between score and EF category was significant (p=0.013). In HFpEF, each 1-SD increase in score was associated with a 0.89 g/day higher urine-estimated salt intake (95% CI 0.37–1.40, p=0.001). Loop diuretic use attenuated overall correlations (Loop+: ρ=0.14, p=0.16; Loop−: ρ=0.35, p=0.003), consistent with pharmacologic modulation of sodium handling. Conclusions In this prospective cohort of ambulatory HF patients with prior hospitalization, a Japanese diet–specific salt checklist demonstrated significant construct validity against urine-estimated salt intake, with stronger associations observed in HFpEF. These findings suggest EF-dependent differences in dietary sodium assessment and support the potential utility of this culturally tailored checklist for outpatient dietary management in HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=174). Japanese diet–specific salt checklist score vs. Urine-estimated salt intake from spot urine was evaluated on Urine-estimated salt intake from spot urine (ρ 0.214, p=0.005). The Japanese diet-specific salt checklist correlated with urine-estimated salt intake in ambulatory HF patients (ρ=0.214, p=0.005), driven by HFpEF (ρ=0.332, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: