When a thermal environment damps the two transverse components of a qubit differently, can entangling signals across many channel uses improve the classical communication rate? This article gives a complete coding answer for an explicit phase-sensitive class and determines the optimal exponential cost of transmitting above capacity. Physical model and communication permissions. The channel acts as \[ N\!{pmatrix}ρ_0&X\^*&ρ_1{pmatrix}={pmatrix}aρ_0+bρ_1&kX+ X^*\^*+ X&cρ_0+dρ_1{pmatrix}.\] All coefficients are nonnegative, \(a+c=b+d=1\), and the main class satisfies \[k≥≥0, ad-bc=k^2-^2, bc≥(k+).\] The class contains actual squeezed thermal reservoirs, including nonunital channels that are not entanglement breaking. The coding model is unassisted and memoryless, without feedback; arbitrary entangled block codewords and collective decoding are allowed. The coefficient condition is a sufficient region, not a classification of every physically allowed squeezed bath. An exact capacity from one-use data. Write \(h_2\) for binary entropy in bits, \(q\) for the excited-state input population, and define \[t(q)=c+(d-c)q, s_x(q)=h_2\!({1+√[1-2t(q)]^2+4(k+)^2q(1-q)}{2}).\] With \(cos_x\) the lower convex envelope on \([0,1]\), the unrestricted capacity is \[C( N)=χ( N)=max0≤ q≤1\{h_2[t(q)]-(cos_x)(q)\}.\] At most two opposite-real-phase signal pairs, hence at most four pure signals, attain the one-use optimum. The convex envelope retains optimization over all ensembles. Holevo information is additive with every finite-dimensional channel partner, so arbitrarily long entangled encodings cannot exceed this rate. The best success exponent above capacity. Let \(P_n^(R)\) be the optimal average success probability over all \(n\)-use codes with at least \(2nR\) messages. For \(R>C( N)\), \[Esc(R, N)=limn→∞-1nlog_2P_n^(R)=α>1α-1/α\,[R-χ_α( N)].\] Here \(χ_α\) is the sandwiched Rényi information radius, reduced in the paper to a scalar reference/population optimization. It is strongly additive at every real \(α>1\). Product codewords with collective decoding attain the asymptotic exponent, while the converse covers arbitrary entangled codewords. The finite-block inequality \(P_n^(R)≤2^{-nEsc}\) is an upper bound, not a finite-block equality. Why the reduction works. Normal and reversed positive block factors retain the same quantum source and admit a common scalar Gram bound. This yields maximum-output norm multiplicativity with arbitrary completely positive partners and unnormalized diagonal filters. Binary phase symmetry then suffices to make the information-radius reference diagonal, even though continuous phase covariance is absent. The same input-filter comparison also determines the formation cost of the specified diagonal-input Stinespring states across the output and the full purified environment. Relation to existing results. We independently obtained the additivity and strong-converse results for the axially symmetric Davies family that are also established by L. Eriksson, Capacities, strong-converse exponents and complementary simulation for qubit Davies channels, version 3, 26 October 2026. These results and their proofs are retained as a reference case. The phase-sensitive class and the full axial Davies class share the generalized-amplitude-damping boundary; neither is presented as a strict enlargement of the other. Fang's triangular norm-compression theorem and the general information-radius and coding theorems retain their attribution. The 16-page integrated article contains the full proofs, two figure groups and references. The figures separate the physical parameter region, the globally evaluated capacity formula and explicit finite-block success upper bounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zixuan He (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: