This classroom action research aimed to describe the implementation of a flipbook-assisted Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model and the resulting improvements in students' motivation, engagement, and learning outcomes regarding argumentative texts. The subjects were 35 students from class XI.II at MAN 2 Brebes. The study was conducted over two cycles following the Kemmis–McTaggart model, after a pre-cycle data collection phase. Data were gathered using a motivation questionnaire (35 items), an activity observation sheet (12 aspects), and a learning outcome test (20 items); these were analyzed using descriptive quantitative methods and supplemented by qualitative notes—specifically reflections and documentation. Results showed that average motivation scores rose from 69.32 to 78.95 in Cycle I and 83.83 in Cycle II; activity scores increased from 68.63 to 78.98 and 83.51; and learning outcomes improved from 65.28 to 79.14 and 90.14 (categorized as "Very Good"). Class mastery across all three aspects rose from 20.00% to 82.86% and 94.29%, thereby exceeding the 75% success indicator. The greatest improvement was observed in the group with low initial proficiency (+30.00 points), although two students did not achieve mastery and required individual remediation. In conclusion, the flipbook-assisted PBL model—refined between cycles—is suitable for enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in the study of argumentative texts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rizkia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: