Key result
AI-ECG scores for LV dysfunction predict substantial LVEF decline in new-onset LBBB.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch block is associated with an increased risk of incident left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and identifying high-risk patients early for timely management remains challenging.
Do AI-derived ECG markers and clinical/echocardiographic parameters predict a ≥20% LVEF decline in patients with newly diagnosed LBBB and preserved LVEF?
Cohort (n=769)
Do AI-derived ECG markers and clinical/echocardiographic parameters predict a ≥20% LVEF decline in patients with newly diagnosed LBBB and preserved LVEF?
AI-derived ECG markers of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction independently predict future significant LVEF decline in patients with new-onset LBBB and preserved baseline LVEF, offering a tool for enhanced risk stratification and monitoring.
May aid risk stratification in new-onset LBBB; extends AI-ECG associations but hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been associated with an increased risk of incident left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Identifying high-risk patients early is challenging but important for timely management. OBJECTIVES To identify predictors of significant left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline in patients with LBBB using clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic data. METHODS A retrospective cohort of 769 patients with newly diagnosed LBBB and preserved LVEF (≥50%) was analyzed. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify predictors of ≥20% LVEF decline on follow-up echocardiography as the primary outcome. A risk prediction model was constructed using pooled estimates. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years (IQR 2.3-8.4), 242 patients (31.5%) experienced LVEF decline ≥20%. In multivariable Cox regression, two AI-derived ECG scores previously developed to detect LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction were independently associated with LVEF decline (HR=1.01, per 1% probability increase for low LVEF; p=0.005; and HR=1.25, per predicted diastolic dysfunction grade, p=0.005, respectively). The final model demonstrated modest discriminative ability with C-index of 0.615, improving to 0.65 after adjusting for baseline LVEF and further to 0.70 in a landmark analysis of 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AI-derived ECG markers of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction independently predicted future LVEF decline in patients with new-onset LBBB. Echocardiographic parameters may also enhance risk stratification. This predictive framework could be utilized to support monitoring and early intervention strategies in patients with LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goings et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=769). AI-derived ECG scores for LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction was evaluated on ≥20% left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline on follow-up echocardiography (HR 1.01 (low LVEF score); HR 1.25 (diastolic dysfunction grade), p=0.005). AI-derived ECG scores for LV systolic (HR 1.01, p=0.005) and diastolic dysfunction (HR 1.25, p=0.005) independently predicted ≥20% LVEF decline in new-onset LBBB.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: