Key result
Eye and finger movements couple significantly with respiration, but show no link to cardiac cycles.
Why the study?
Although an allostasis-first account proposes that the brain coordinates with bodily systems to select actions based on predicted metabolic costs, it remained unclear how this coordination unfolds over different timescales of action and across physiological systems like breathing and the heartbeat.
Observational
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrates that voluntary eye and finger movements are temporally coordinated with cardiorespiratory cycles, particularly respiration and specific phases of the cardiac cycle.
An allostasis-first account proposes that the brain coordinates with the systems of the body to select actions based on predicted metabolic costs. However, it remains unclear how this coordination unfolds over different timescales of action (i.e., movements), and differs across body systems with different intrinsic timescales, such as breathing or the heartbeat. In the present study, we tested how eye and finger movements during a self-paced visual search task were coordinated in time with respiratory and cardiac cycles. We quantified coupling between each movement and physiological signal using a modulation index method, which quantifies non-uniformity in the distribution of movements across a physiological cycle. We performed several follow-up analyses to characterize when during a physiological cycle more or fewer movements occurred, and whether effects differed across participants. Aggregated across participants, our results demonstrated robust coupling between eye and finger movements and the respiratory cycle, as well as inhalation and exhalation phases. Coupling results were non-significant when examining the entire cardiac cycle, but follow-up analyses by systolic and diastolic phase indicated that eye movements were more or less likely at specific times within systole and diastole. Broadly, our results indicate that action is coordinated in time with cardiorespiratory cycles, in particular with the respiratory cycle, across a majority of our participant sample. These findings provide a foundation for future examination of how naturally occurring physiological cycles may coordinate with the timing of actions, and how metabolic resources may be efficiently managed through allostasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McVeigh et al. (2026) reported an observational. Respiratory and cardiac cycles was evaluated on Coupling between eye and finger movements and physiological cycles (modulation index). Eye and finger movements during a visual search task showed robust coupling with the respiratory cycle, whereas overall cardiac cycle coupling was non-significant.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: