Key result
Empagliflozin matches dapagliflozin for LVEF improvement but is linked to better symptom scores.
Why the study?
Although empagliflozin and dapagliflozin have proven cardiovascular benefits in clinical trials, there is little data directly comparing their effects on heart function, laboratory parameters, echocardiography, and quality of life in real-world heart failure settings.
Does empagliflozin 10 mg daily improve left ventricular ejection fraction, clinical parameters, and KCCQ-12 quality of life scores compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily in hospitalized heart failure patients?
Observational (n=70)
No
Does empagliflozin 10 mg daily improve left ventricular ejection fraction, clinical parameters, and KCCQ-12 quality of life scores compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily in hospitalized heart failure patients?
In a small prospective observational comparison of hospitalized heart failure patients, empagliflozin and dapagliflozin produced equivalent short-term improvements in LVEF and systolic blood pressure, though dapagliflozin caused a larger drop in serum sodium while empagliflozin yielded greater glucose reduction in diabetics and better 3-month KCCQ-12 symptom frequency scores.
Similar LVEF gains support interchangeable SGLT2i use; leaves open whether empagliflozin's symptom advantage is real or confounded.
Background: SGLT2 inhibitors have transformed heart failure treatment, especially empagliflozin and dapagliflozin.Although both have proven cardiovascular benefits in clinical trials, there is little data comparing them in real-world settings.This study aims to address that by comparing their effects on heart function, lab tests, echocardiography, and quality of life using routine clinical data and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12.Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with 70 heart failure patients, evenly divided between those taking empagliflozin 10 mg daily and those on dapagliflozin 10 mg daily as part of their usual care.We collected vital signs, blood tests, echocardiographic measures, including left ventricular ejection fraction, and KCCQ-12 scores.Statistical analysis included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, ANOVA, Shapiro-Wilk for normality, Levene's test for equal variances, and Pearson correlation.Results with p-values under 0.005 were considered significant.Results: The groups were similar in age, gender, rates of hypertension, HbA1c, and lipid levels.However, more patients in the dapagliflozin group had diabetes (68.6% vs. 31.4%,p=0.007).Both drugs significantly lowered systolic blood pressure and improved ejection fraction.Dapagliflozin caused a larger drop in sodium levels (2.51 vs 0.83 mEq/L, p=0.007).Among diabetic patients, empagliflozin reduced blood glucose by a greater amount (-75.00 vs -42.33 mg/dL).Patients on empagliflozin also had higher overall KCCQ-12 scores (66.22 vs. 56.06),with a significant difference in symptom frequency (p=0.033).Improvements in ejection fraction, kidney function, hemoglobin, and lipids were similar for both drugs.Conclusions: Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin showed similar effects in heart failure patients, though some important differences emerged.Empagliflozin was associated with greater reductions in KCCQ-12 symptom frequency scores and blood sugar levels in patients with diabetes, whereas dapagliflozin was associated with a larger drop in serum sodium levels.These results suggest that although both drugs are generally equivalent, individual differences might guide personalized treatment choices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study conducted an observational in Heart Failure (n=70). Empagliflozin 10 mg daily vs. Dapagliflozin 10 mg daily was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to discharge (MD 1.0%, p=0.102). Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin produced similar improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (+5% vs +4%, p=0.102), while empagliflozin yielded better KCCQ-12 symptom frequency scores (p=0.033).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: