The instantaneous superluminal synchronization of quantum entanglement is one of the most core and controversial fundamental problems in modern quantum mechanics. For a century, Einstein’s hidden variable hypothesis based on local realism and Bohr’s interpretation of quantum randomness have never been self-consistently compatible, forming a classic physical paradox: why entangled particles can achieve instantaneous state synchronization at spacelike intervals without violating the principle of constancy of light speed. Traditional quantum mechanics only describes the phenomenon mathematically through wave function collapse and fails to reveal the underlying physical mechanism of entanglement synchronization. Based on the FQ Gravitational Pressure Unified Field Theory, this paper takes the global graviton fluid as the underlying cosmic medium and establishes a quantum homologous vortex topological channel model. This study proves that entangled particle pairs are not independent individuals in three-dimensional space, but dual vortex topological structures homogeneously differentiated from the underlying graviton fluid. They form a rigidly connected system relying on high-dimensional continuous topological channels and are constrained by global flux conservation. Through the derivation of fluid pressure difference perturbation and instantaneous topological stress transmission, this paper completely restores the physical process of quantum observation collapse and state synchronization, and explains the essential mechanism of delay-free quantum entanglement synchronization at the fundamental physical level. The proposed model perfectly avoids the paradox of superluminal signals and thoroughly resolves the century-long debate between hidden variables and pure randomness. It provides a novel fluid mechanics paradigm for quantum entanglement, quantum correlation and quantum nonlocality, and further optimizes the microscopic quantum framework of the FQ Unified Field Theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ZhenFeng BIAN (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: