This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A stop command ends a process, not what the process set in motion. Before it stops, an AI agent can issue a credential, queue an instruction, schedule a job or delegate work. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for judging whether that retired authority can still produce a protected business effect. Business-impact analysis defines the effect first, and reconciled evidence and negative tests then challenge the routes. A surviving route is FAIL. Unresolved state, attribution or timing is INCONCLUSIVE. Adequate evidence over a justified window supports a bounded PASS. The cutoff is the accepted stop demand, so later containment does not erase a late accepted effect. Independent authorization needs its own assessment. All three outcomes enter a scenario-conditioned loss interval, shown with three constructed payment cases and an OpenAI sandbox incident (scope errors only). The contribution is a decision framework. No implementation, detection gain or reviewer validation is claimed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Codangudi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: