A mathematical bit error rate (BER) model for upsets in memories protected by error-correcting codes (ECCs) and scrubbing is derived. This model is compared with expected upset rates for sub-100-nm SRAM memories in space environments. Because sub-100-nm SRAM memory cells can be upset by a critical charge (Qcrit) of 1.1 fC or less, they may exhibit significantly higher upset rates than those reported in earlier technologies. Because of this, single-bit-correcting ECCs may become impractical due to memory scrubbing rate limitations. The overhead needed for protecting memories with a triple-bit-correcting ECC is examined relative to an approximate 2X ldquoprocess generationrdquo scaling penalty in area, speed, and power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajura et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: