Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has strategically co-opted a network of non-state armed actors across the Middle East. While existing scholarship itemizes these linkages, multifariously termed “proxy forces” or “the axis of resistance”, the constitutive logic underlying such alliances is undertheorized. This article maintains that Iran’s proxy networks are not opportunistic but establish a comprehensible grand strategy constituted by ideological affinity, emphasized threat perception, and asymmetric deterrence calculus. Based on multi-case study methodology including Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, and proceeding from foreign policy analysis and proxy warfare theory, the study scrutinizes the political, ideological, and financial mechanisms reinforcing these ties within Iran’s post-revolutionary security doctrine and its rivalry with the United States and Israel. The findings reveal that proxy deployment represents an asymmetric advantage authorizing power projection while diminishing direct military contact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad Pashayi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: