Examines religious discourse shaping Iran’s foreign policy, linking ideological concepts to geopolitical strategies.
This paper examines the role of religious discourse in shaping the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, with a particular focus on the speeches of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It argues that Iran’s foreign policy is neither purely ideological nor strictly pragmatic; rather, it emerges from the interplay between Shiite (Shia) religious concepts and geopolitical imperatives. Central concepts—such as the Islamic Revolution, the oppressed (mostazafin), the Islamic Ummah, jihad, resistance, and martyrdom—form a coherent semantic system that legitimizes strategic policies, anti-hegemonic positions, and support for allied non-state actors across the Middle East. By linking theological narratives to strategic objectives, Iran frames its foreign policy within a moral–religious universe, positioning itself as a defender of oppressed communities, a promoter of South–South solidarity, and a challenger to Western-dominated international structures. The study demonstrates that while religious ideology provides normative and motivational resources, practical foreign policy decisions are shaped by structural, geopolitical, and domestic constraints, reflecting a hybrid strategy that combines moral discourse with strategic pragmatism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alıbabalu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: