Background/Objectives: Previous studies reported that basal-like breast cancers may originate from luminal progenitors, suggesting that a classification of this malignancy is not strictly indicative of its cellular origin. Reinforcing this notion, we recently provided experimental evidence in genetically engineered models that basal-like and claudin-low mammary tumors, the two most common triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) types, can evolve from transformed luminal epithelial cells. The primary objective of this study was to define, at the single-cell level, the earliest molecular changes associated with neoplastic transformation prior to the formation of mammary cancer. Methods: We isolated green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled mammary epithelial cells from MMTV-Flp FSF-KrasG12D Rosa26FSF-GFP mice and controls without mutant KRAS by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and performed particle-templated instant partition sequencing (PIP-seq). Following hierarchical clustering of the single-cell transcriptomes, as well as differential gene expression and gene ontology analyses, we used Slingshot, TSCAN, and Monocle3 to infer developmental trajectories of luminal epithelial cell states. Results: Based on their single-cell transcriptomes, GFP-expressing mammary epithelial cells were predominantly luminal-type and resolved into 11 transcriptionally distinct cellular states organized into six functional groups. Most notably, mutant KRAS induced a novel oncogenic-permissive state with unique molecular features, including cancer-associated metabolic reprogramming, oncogenic pathway activation, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal cell plasticity. Trajectory inference positioned this KRAS-associated state along an alveolar progenitor differentiation path. Conclusions: The collective results provide new insights into the epithelial states associated with early neoplastic transformation and identify signaling and metabolic programs that may present candidate targets for cancer prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wicker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: