The high failure rate of new ventures is frequently rooted in upstream planning information distortion driven by the dominance of optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation. This article aims to formulate a new methodological design in entrepreneurial feasibility analysis by positioning Veritology as an independent theoretical backbone. Utilizing a Mechanical Epistemology approach derived from the Teleological Algorithm of Veritology, the feasibility assessment is shifted from linguistic-narrative formalities toward the identification of structural anomalies within planning drafts based on material capacity constraints. The designed Veritology-Based Business Feasibility Evaluation Method (V-BFEM) extracts feasibility value through three core instruments: the separation of Organic Data (ℸ_o) from Constructed Data (∁_c), the forensic calibration of the Material-Anchored Deviation Index (MADI) utilizing a dynamic sectorial dispersal window, and the continuous exponential decay execution of the Ontological Veto Operator (V_∘). By embedding physical capacity gap scores directly as a conditional multiplier within the evaluation loop, this streamlined design prevents the mathematical error of structural double-counting while offering a materially anchored feasibility evaluation framework that remains subject to future empirical calibration, inter-rater reliability testing, and predictive validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christ Windreis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: