Key result
Permanent pacemakers are linked to ~31 percentage points less reduced LVEF compared with intrinsic LBBB.
Why the study?
Patients with right ventricular pacing from permanent cardiac pacemakers have ECG patterns similar to LBBB, and while ECG criteria for LBBB in patients with reduced LVEF are well established, these criteria have not been clarified for patients with RV pacing.
Do electrocardiographic parameters associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<50%) differ between patients with right ventricular pacing from permanent cardiac pacemakers and patients with left bundle branch block?
Observational (n=296)
Do electrocardiographic parameters associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<50%) differ between patients with right ventricular pacing from permanent cardiac pacemakers and patients with left bundle branch block?
Specific ECG features associated with reduced LVEF (<50%) differ between patients with intrinsic LBBB (longer QRS duration and lateral q waves) and those with RV pacing (broad, notched, or slurred lateral R waves).
Background: Patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing from permanent cardiac pacemakers have electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns similar to those with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Although ECG criteria for LBBB in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are well established, these criteria have not been clarified for patients with RV pacing. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, between January 2016 and August 2025, 193 patients were diagnosed with LBBB, of whom 118 were included. During the same period, 475 patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers were identified, of whom 178 were eligible for the study. Results: In the LBBB group (male/female, 55/63; mean [SD] age, 67 [12] years), 57% of patients had LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%), whereas in the pacemaker group (male/female, 93/85; mean [SD] age, 72 [11] years), only 26% had an LVEF less than 50%. Mean QRS duration was longer in patients with reduced LVEF than in those with normal LV systolic function (155 [13] vs 147 [12] milliseconds, respectively; P=.034). Conclusion: Although the ECG pattern associated with RV pacing from a permanent cardiac pacemaker resembles that of LBBB, its association with LV dysfunction differs. In patients with LBBB, longer QRS duration and the presence of q waves in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6 were associated with reduced LVEF, whereas in patients with RV pacing, a broad, notched, or slurred R wave in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6 was associated with reduced LVEF
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muzaffar et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Left bundle branch block (LBBB) or permanent cardiac pacemaker with right ventricular pacing (n=296). Permanent cardiac pacemaker with right ventricular pacing vs. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) was evaluated on Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%). Patients with permanent pacemakers had a 26% rate of reduced LVEF (<50%) vs 57% in LBBB, with longer QRS duration associated with reduced LVEF (155 vs 147 ms; P=.034).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: