Key result
Door-to-balloon times in low- and middle-income countries hit guideline targets in ~71% of studies.
Why the study?
Reperfusion delays remain common in low- and middle-income countries, prompting this systematic evaluation of door-to-balloon performance, determinants of delay, and reported clinical outcomes in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI in LMIC settings.
Does primary percutaneous coronary intervention pathway optimisation improve door-to-balloon time and clinical outcomes in adults with STEMI in low- and middle-income countries?
Systematic Review (n=29,319)
Yes
Does primary percutaneous coronary intervention pathway optimisation improve door-to-balloon time and clinical outcomes in adults with STEMI in low- and middle-income countries?
Door-to-balloon times and mortality vary widely across low- and middle-income countries, highlighting that quality-improvement programmes must address prehospital, transfer, financial, and administrative barriers alongside hospital-level protocolised activation to reduce total ischaemic time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Performance gaps in LMICs may warrant targeted quality-improvement programs; extends STEMI reperfusion benchmarks to resource-limited settings.
Background Door-to-balloon (D2B) time is an important quality indicator in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Reperfusion delays remain common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review evaluated D2B performance, factors associated with timely or delayed reperfusion and reported clinical outcomes in LMIC settings. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to 1 st August 2026. Studies reporting D2B time, related reperfusion intervals, target attainment, determinants of delay, or associated outcomes among adults with STEMI undergoing pPCI in LMICs were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised narratively. Results Twenty-four studies collectively enrolling 29,319 patients with STEMI across 11 LMIC settings were included. Conventional study-level D2B estimates ranged from 34 to 169 min. Among 17 studies with conventional D2B estimates that could be classified relative to the 90 min benchmark, 12 reported values consistently within 90 min and five reported values exceeding 90 min; three additional studies reported subgroup or intervention-period estimates spanning the threshold. Reported facilitators included continuous pPCI availability, single-call catheterisation-laboratory activation, simulation-based team training, direct emergency-department-to-catheterisation-laboratory transfer, regular audit and feedback, ambulance presentation, and organised referral networks. Reported barriers included delayed presentation, interhospital transfer, limited emergency medical service utilisation, reduced out-of-hours capacity, financial or administrative processes, treatment-consent delays, and movement or transport restrictions. Crude in-hospital mortality ranged from 1.0% to 24.3%. Several studies reported associations between longer reperfusion intervals and mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or myocardial injury. Conclusions D2B performance varied substantially across LMIC settings. Protocolised activation, continuous pPCI availability, multidisciplinary training, and coordinated referral pathways were reported alongside shorter treatment intervals, whereas prehospital, transfer, financial, and administrative delays remained important barriers. Quality-improvement programmes should address total ischaemic time rather than D2B time alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamileh et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=29,319). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) pathway and door-to-balloon (D2B) time performance vs. 90-minute D2B benchmark or pre-intervention/delayed reperfusion pathways was evaluated on Conventional door-to-balloon (D2B) time (interval from arrival at PCI-capable hospital to balloon inflation or first device-mediated reperfusion). Door-to-balloon times in low- and middle-income countries ranged from 34 to 169 minutes across 24 studies, with 12 of 17 classifiable studies achieving the ≤90-minute benchmark and in-hospital mortality ranging from 1.0% to 24.3%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: