Key result
Personalized accelerated pacing and conduction system pacing show promise over RVP for optimizing HFpEF outcomes.
Why the study?
Do contemporary and emerging physiologic cardiac pacing strategies improve cardiac output and clinical outcomes compared with conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with HFpEF?
Do contemporary and emerging physiologic cardiac pacing strategies improve cardiac output and clinical outcomes compared with conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with HFpEF?
This review highlights the pathophysiologic rationale and early promise of personalized accelerated and conduction system pacing in HFpEF while underscoring the need for prospective randomized trials.
May support pacing trials in HFpEF with conduction disease; leaves open clinical benefit pending randomized data.
Purpose of Review Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most prevalent heart failure phenotype and carries substantial morbidity and mortality, yet effective device-based therapies are lacking. Sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular block are common in this population and contribute to impaired cardiac reserve and exercise intolerance, providing a pathophysiologic rationale for cardiac pacing as a therapeutic strategy. This review examines the physiologic rationale, current evidence, and clinical decision-making for contemporary and emerging pacing strategies in HFpEF. Recent Findings A range of contemporary pacing approaches — including personalized accelerated pacing and conduction system pacing — is under investigation, each aiming to optimize cardiac output and loading conditions while avoiding the adverse effects of non-physiologic pacing. Conventional right ventricular pacing is independently associated with worse outcomes in HFpEF, reinforcing the rationale for physiologic alternatives. Summary Contemporary and emerging pacing strategies show promise for HFpEF, but prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to define their role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Callander et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Contemporary and emerging cardiac pacing strategies (personalized accelerated pacing and conduction system pacing) vs. Conventional right ventricular pacing was evaluated. Personalized accelerated pacing and conduction system pacing show promise to optimize cardiac output in HFpEF, whereas conventional right ventricular pacing is associated with worse outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: