Why the study?
Neonatal malignant arrhythmias refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy are life-threatening and pose a major therapeutic challenge, particularly in premature infants.
Does veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation followed by targeted oral mexiletine and propranolol restore sinus rhythm and cardiac function in a premature neonate with refractory malignant arrhythmia carrying an SCN5A variant?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation followed by targeted oral mexiletine and propranolol restore sinus rhythm and cardiac function in a premature neonate with refractory malignant arrhythmia carrying an SCN5A variant?
Early veno-arterial ECMO can serve as an effective salvage therapy for neonatal refractory malignant arrhythmias complicated by heart failure, providing a bridge to genetic diagnosis and targeted antiarrhythmic therapy with mexiletine in SCN5A-related long QT syndrome type 3.
May support ECMO bridge in refractory neonatal VT; leaves open SCN5A variant pathogenicity and mexiletine response.
Background Neonatal malignant arrhythmias refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy are life-threatening and pose a major therapeutic challenge, particularly in premature infants. Case presentation We report a premature infant born at 36 + 2 weeks of gestation who developed ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest following resuscitation for perinatal asphyxia. As lidocaine and amiodarone failed to control the rhythm, veno‑arterial ECMO was initiated shortly thereafter. After ECMO support, the rhythm converted to sinus and cardiac function improved, allowing successful weaning. Electrocardiography subsequently revealed a prolonged QT interval, which responded to oral mexiletine. Whole‑exome sequencing identified a heterozygous SCN5A c.1960G > A (p.Glu654Lys) variant inherited from the father, classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Conclusions This case suggests that this specific VUS may be a candidate pathogenic variant, and that early ECMO can be an effective salvage therapy when conventional drugs fail. Additionally, when genetic testing yields a VUS, the clinical phenotype and treatment response appear valuable for assessing pathogenicity in neonatal cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yixian et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Neonatal refractory malignant ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest with an SCN5A c.1960G>A (p.Glu654Lys) variant (n=1). Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) followed by oral propranolol and mexiletine was evaluated on Rhythm conversion, weaning from ECMO, and arrhythmia control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: