Key result
Geriatric surgical consults in frail elderly yield minimal operative mortality and up to ~79% 1-year survival.
Why the study?
Surgeons are increasingly faced with consultation for intervention in residents of geriatric centers or in patients with end stage medical disease, motivating a review of experience with consult services dedicated to these frail patients.
Cohort (n=256)
Yes
Dedicated geriatric surgical consult services allow frail elderly patients and those with end-stage heart failure to safely undergo both minor maintenance and major elective surgeries with low operative mortality and survival comparable to non-surgical peers.
Supports feasibility of geriatric consult-managed surgery in frail elderly; hypothesis-generating for survival differences, requiring RCTs before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Surgeons are increasingly faced with consultation for intervention in residents of geriatric centers or in patients who suffer from end stage medical disease. We review our experience with consult services dedicated to the needs of these frail patients. STUDY DESIGN: Patients were prospectively followed after being evaluated by three different geriatric surgical consult services: Group 1 was based at a geriatric center associated with a tertiary medical center, Group 2 was based at a community geriatric center, and Group 3 was based with an hospital-based service for ambulatory patients with end stage congestive heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 256 frail elderly patients underwent of 311 general surgical procedures ranging from major abdominal and vascular procedures to minor procedures such as debridement of decubitus ulcers, long-term intravenous access, enterostomy and enteral tube placement. Almost half of the surgical volume in Group 1 and 3 were 'maintenance' (decubitus debridement, long term intravenous or stomal or tube care); all of Group 2 were for treatment of decubiti. There was minimal morbidity and mortality from surgery itself, and overall one year survival for Groups 1, 2, and 3 was 46%, 60%, and 79%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that each group had its own unique indicators of decreased survival: Group 1 dementia and coronary artery disease, in Group 2 gender and coronary artery disease, and Group 3, gender alone. Age, number of comorbid illnesses, and type of surgery (major vs minor) were not significant indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review of the role of dedicated surgical consult services which focused on residents of geriatric centers and frail elderly. Conditions routinely encountered in this population such as dementia, end stage disease, multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, decreased functional and nutritional status are not frequently encountered by general surgeons. But the surgery is safe, and survival data is comparable to those in geriatric centers who did not undergo surgery. A multidisciplinary team approach gives the most effective care, with a primary goal of palliation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zenilman et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Frail elderly patients with surgical disease (geriatric center residents or ambulatory patients with end-stage congestive heart failure) (n=256). Dedicated geriatric general surgical consult services and surgical intervention was evaluated on 1-year overall actuarial survival across Groups 1, 2, and 3. General surgical procedures via dedicated geriatric consult services in frail elderly yielded minimal operative mortality and 1-year survival of 46% (Group 1), 60% (Group 2), and 79% (Group 3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: