Transport infrastructure can enlarge rural market access, but its tourism benefits are unlikely to be evenly distributed across space. This study examines how improvements in expressway-gateway accessibility are associated with tourism-firm entry and how this association varies across villages in mountainous Yunnan, China. We construct a balanced panel of 11,665 rural villages from 2018 to 2025, yielding 93,320 village-year observations. The database integrates annual road networks and expressway gateways, firm-registration records, pre-treatment cultural resources, pre-treatment local organisational and industrial capacity, points of interest, remote-sensing indicators and natural conditions. Network travel-time savings are analysed using village and year fixed-effects models, interaction models and spatial exposure analysis. By 2025, average travel-time savings to the nearest expressway gateway reached 78.22 min. Each 10-min reduction was positively associated with tourism-firm entry (coefficient = 0.0028, SE = 0.0006, p < 0.001), with stronger responses in accommodation and catering. The association was stronger in villages with richer cultural resources and greater pre-existing local capacity, whereas county-seat accessibility showed a different pattern. Spatially, the clearest firm-entry response occurred in villages experiencing direct accessibility improvements. These findings suggest that accessibility gains create spatially selective rural tourism opportunities. Transport policy should therefore be coordinated with cultural-resource development, local capacity building and cross-village corridor planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: