Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This exploration examines the impact of supplementary AI-generated explanatory materials on foundational mathematics learning and creative metacognition in primary education. The study followed a quantitative, quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design with a nonequivalent control group. Fourth-grade classes in five schools were assigned to conditions at the classroom level: an intervention group receiving AI-facilitated handouts (n = 135) and a control group using programmatic textbooks (n = 128). Students in the experimental condition received eight supplementary lessons featuring paper-based handouts. These handouts presented explanations, examples, and illustrations of new mathematical topics generated by a large language model (Gemini 2.5 Pro), prompted the inclusion of age-appropriate content and a dedicated section encouraging creative metacognition (reflection and novel idea generation). Baseline equivalence was confirmed. The outcomes assessed included single-digit mental arithmetic, multidigit calculation, arithmetic word problem-solving, and creative metacognition, which were analyzed via multilevel or robust linear modeling accounting for classroom clustering. The results indicated no statistically significant differences between groups on single-digit mental arithmetic tasks. However, students who received AI-generated materials showed significantly greater improvement in multidigit calculation tasks and one-step word problem-solving than did the control group. No significant difference was found for multistep word problems. The intervention group also presented a substantially greater increase in creative metacognition scores than did the control group. The findings provide preliminary quasi-experimental evidence that curated, static AI-generated explanations, when designed to include metacognitive prompts, may be associated with greater gains in specific procedural and applied mathematical skills and creative metacognition among fourth-grade students under the conditions studied. This approach illustrates how generative AI can be leveraged as an authoring tool to supplement standard instruction and cultivate higher-order cognitive skills in young learners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karatayeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: