SAE Theory of Inter-State Cooperation · Paper 6: Admission and Rescue / SAE 国家间协作论 第六篇: 接纳与救援

This paper asks: when people outside the system come out of a state, what must the system and its members do, and what can they do; when people cannot get out, how far can armed force go, and where does what it cannot reach fall? The whole paper runs through the "state of stability" in the Republic of the Sandbars and the flight across the two banks of the Grey River. It draws on a journalist who fled, a sharing decision that drew lots by household, the shelling of the camp on the east bank and Stonegorge's proposal to protect a corridor, a common sanction against the Sandbars, and the north of the Sandbars setting itself up on its own and applying to join; three supposed cases are set alongside for contrast: a commander who has crossed the line flees to the camp, Stonegorge enters the west bank to protect a corridor, and the Sandbars government invites the NUT to guard a reception point. What it answers comes to this. Creating conditions for the cultivation of people outside the system means, for those who can get out, first of all making their exit real, and the conditions are built only where the system's acts can reach. At the door of any state, no one is pushed back; those who have crossed the line are not pushed back at the door either, but asylum does not write off the account. What the system's sharing divides is the shares of the states; it does not sort people, and the room not to go to a given state must be actually usable. Those who leave are not treated as instruments for going back to change the order there. In rescue, the part that must be done is the same for the system as for a single state; what the system has more of lies in what can be done. Divided by place: guarding the line on this state's own side is not starting a war, and entering another state without invitation is starting a war; guarding, by invitation, those who arrive and the supplies, and escorting those who leave of their own will, form a slot of their own, where returning fire goes no further than stopping the attack on the spot, and an escort used to help one side drive out a population is not permitted. The system does not authorize the use of armed force; intervention and assistance are divided by judgment, and judgment follows control. While internal strife is not yet decided, outside force does not intervene; that the system has not yet admitted means that it has already judged that armed intervention is not yet possible. The cost borne by those who cannot reach the door, and by those like them, is written down as it stands. Along the way the paper interfaces with Grotius, Vattel and Rawls, and at the end it converses with the Fifth Preliminary Article of Kant's Perpetual Peace. The paper has eight propositions (XZ37 to XZ44), each stated at the end of its section and listed together at the end. 这一篇问:体系外的人从一国走出来时,体系与成员须做什么、能做什么;人走不出来时,武力能走到哪里,走不到的落在哪里。全篇以沙洲共和国的安定状态与灰河两岸的出逃贯穿,用到一位出逃的记者、一份以户抽签的分担决定、东岸营地遭到的炮击与石峡邦护通道的提议、一项对沙洲的共同制裁、沙洲北部的自立与申请加入;另以三个设例作对照:一位越过了线的指挥官逃到营地,石峡邦进入西岸护通道,沙洲政府邀请 NUT 守护一处接收点。答到这里。为体系外的人的涵育创造条件,对走得出来的人,首先是让他们的退出成为真的,条件只造在体系施为够得着的地方。任何一国门口都不推回;越过了线的人到了门口也不推回,庇护却不销账。体系的分担分的是各国的份额,不分拣人,不去某一国的余地要实际可用。出走的人不当作回去换秩序的工具。救援里须的部分,体系与一国相同;体系多的是能。按地点分:本国一侧守线不算开战,未经邀请进入别国就是开战;应邀守护来到的人与物资、护送自愿离开的人另成一格,还手就地挡住即止,被用来帮一方驱逐人口的护送不许。体系不授权动武;介入与协助按判断力分,判断力跟着控制走。内争未决,外力不介入;体系还没有接纳,就是已经判断尚不能武力介入。到不了门口的人那一类代价,照写。随文与格劳秀斯、瓦特尔、罗尔斯对接,篇末与康德《永久和平论》的第五预备条款对话。全篇八条(XZ37 至 XZ44),各节末写出,篇末合列。 Related works Relation Identifier Scheme Resource type Title References 10.5281/zenodo.19328662 DOI Publication / Preprint How Is Institution Possible: From Inter-Ontological Remainder to Co-Constructive Framework (SAE Foundational Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23269330 DOI Publication / Preprint What an Institution Is Not (SAE Institution Theory, Prequel) References 10.5281/zenodo.23270766 DOI Publication / Preprint Guarding the Line (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23270922 DOI Publication / Preprint Conditions (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 4) References 10.5281/zenodo.23271324 DOI Publication / Preprint Open to Questioning (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23411670 DOI Publication / Preprint What a Government Is Not (SAE Theory of Government, Prequel) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413112 DOI Publication / Preprint Guarantee (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23584292 DOI Publication / Preprint What a State Is Not (SAE Theory of the State, Prequel) References 10.5281/zenodo.23584315 DOI Publication / Preprint The Last Rule (SAE Theory of the State, Paper 1) References 10.5281/zenodo.23584325 DOI Publication / Preprint The Last Exit (SAE Theory of the State, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23584346 DOI Publication / Preprint One Another, with No Superior (SAE Theory of the State, Paper 5) References 10.5281/zenodo.23584352 DOI Publication / Preprint The Last Resort (SAE Theory of the State, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23584356 DOI Publication / Preprint Questioning the Last Layer (SAE Theory of the State, Paper 7) References 10.5281/zenodo.23779070 DOI Publication / Preprint The Reverse Phase Transition (SAE Theory of the State, Companion Study) References 10.5281/zenodo.19656617 DOI Publication / Preprint SAE War Treatise: How Cultivation Is Not Swallowed by War Itself References 10.5281/zenodo.20218248 DOI Publication / Preprint Collective 15DD and the Four-Stage Evolution of Community Form (SAE Moral Law, Paper 8) References 10.5281/zenodo.20262737 DOI Publication / Preprint The Institutional Architecture of Mixed Reality: The Phase-Transition Evolution of Cultivation and Colonization (SAE Moral Law, Paper 9) References 10.5281/zenodo.20582210 DOI Publication / Preprint On the Development of Power · Shi (SAE Power Theory, Paper 5)