Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) are both implicated in migraine, but whether they undergo similar acute release from primary sensory terminals remains uncertain. We compared stimulus-evoked CGRP-like immunoreactivity (CGRP-LI) and PACAP-like immunoreactivity (PACAP-LI) in superfused mouse spinal cord tissue. Spinal cords from 14 male C57BL/6 mice were pooled and distributed among six superfusion chambers per stimulus. After two baseline fractions, tissues were exposed to capsaicin (10 μM) or high K+ (40 mM KCl), followed by a post-stimulation fraction. Capsaicin and high K+ produced marked CGRP responses, with mean stimulation-minus-baseline increases of 44.89 and 47.19 pg/mg, respectively, both Holm-adjusted p<0.001. In contrast, PACAP responses were −0.12 and 0.009 pg/mg, with Holm-adjusted p=0.742 and p=0.888. The geometric mean stimulation-to-baseline responses were 23.23-fold and 18.57-fold for CGRP, compared with 0.86-fold and 1.00-fold for PACAP. The corresponding CGRP-to-PACAP ratios of fold responses were 26.99 and 18.51. These findings show a marked dissociation between acute CGRP and PACAP release in this pooled ex vivo spinal cord preparation. They suggest that PACAP should not be assumed to behave as a CGRP-like co-transmitter during acute stimulation of primary sensory neuron (PSN) terminals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iannone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: