Fresh-market balloon flower (Platycodon grandiflorus) roots were evaluated at 0 °C to distinguish dehydration- and decay-limited storage. A 30 μm polyethylene liner (PE30) and woven polypropylene (PP) sacks were compared with and without washing, using three packages per combination in each of two commercial source lots. Package-unit mass loss and visible decay were summarized over 16 weeks using defect-specific endpoints and the marketable-mass retention index (MMRI). PE30 mass loss was 1.4–2.6%, compared with 32.5–39.5% under PP, which reached the dehydration stopping rule. PE30 treatment-mean times to 20% visible decay were 5.5–18.0 weeks, interpolated between fortnightly observations; these differ from PP dehydration endpoints. In one lot, week-16 PE30 decay averaged 15% after washing versus 75% without washing, but statistical support was model-dependent. Descriptive week-16 ΔE, firmness and total phenolic content ranged from 5.21–14.31, 22.56–33.72 N and 46.13–56.73 mg GAE g−1 dry weight, respectively. MMRI combined retained mass and sound-root counts, but did not measure saleable mass. PE30 consistently reduced dehydration under the tested conditions, whereas washing did not show a consistently supported decay benefit. Package-unit assessment distinguishes the dominant failure mode when each endpoint retains its specific criterion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: